Quote:
Originally Posted by pitor
For me it's simple. The key word is BEAR. It's my belief the founding fathers wanted the people to be able to keep and CARRY the same INFANTRY weapons the armed forces of the time possessed.
And so, in line with that thought, I wholeheartedly believe that any modern infantry weapon, a weapon that can be effectively carried by a person, it's protected by the 2A.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackKnight
This is along my line of thinking as well.
|
The thing is, Stingers and other like SMAWs can be "effectively carried" by a person...
