|
|
| Register | Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Donate |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
#1
11-29-2017, 05:19 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
That’s because ballistic test takes about five minutes to compare. The DNA process takes a lot longer and that’s before you can even do a comparison.
I once dropped of a gun used in a crime and before I was 5 miles down the road they called to tell me the gun matched a double homicide from a previous incident. Our lab won’t even do certain DNA testing. All depending on the crime and how the evidence was obtained. For example; if we see a suspect throw a gun they won’t do touch DNA. Their argument being that you have an officers eyewitness statement and testimony. Our argument is yes, but it would really cement our testimony especially since our credibility is always being attacked on the stand. Nope, won’t do it. Due, to the volume, time, and expenditure.
__________________
 Professionals talk about tactics and concepts while amateurs talk about gear and equipment. 
|
|
#2
11-29-2017, 05:26 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Is he dead yet? Thanks for the info brother
__________________
NRA Life Member Wilson Combat CQB Kimber Tactical Pro II S&W J-Frame .38 ect " I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever "  There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name... COTEP #523
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Hybrid Mode