COTEP.org  

Go Back   COTEP.org > Main Category > Main Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2017, 01:56 PM
FfNJGTFO's Avatar
FfNJGTFO FfNJGTFO is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,663
Thanks: 1,522
Thanked 207 Times in 72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade View Post
I think subsection b is the work around you need.
A very risky work around. I think any decent prosecutor would argue (and quite successfully) that the very size and proximity of properties to one another (in my PUD, most properties are .1 acres in area and jammed right next to each other) would pose, by definition, an "unreasonable foreseeable risk to life, safety, or property." This, plus the noise factor (i.e. neighbors hearing gun shots and SWATing other neighbors) and the "children playing in the backyard" factor, etc. etc. If the properties were, at least, 1 acre each and the housing units an acre apart, you might be able to use that subsection B. But, as the famed acronym says...

NIMBY!
Reply With Quote
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.