|
|
| Register | Forums | Blogs | Today's Posts | Search | Donate |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-05-2014, 01:27 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
A thread about the name that shall not be mentioned! WOW! All joking aside my problem with Mimbers is they make 40,000 guns a year and quality control sometimes suffers. That is why you get people that love them and hate them. My other problem is they use mim for their sears. While mim may be good for some parts the sear is not one of them. IMHO
__________________
canis fidelis cave canem, vereor non magnus nocens lupus In hoc signo vinces If you can list them, you ain't got enough!!! Life Member NRA, SCI, ATA, NSCA COTEP 414 
|
|
#2
10-05-2014, 01:49 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
To paraphrase Forrest Gump, Kimbers are like a box of chocolates...  A historical reason to bash Kimbers is how they totally screwed up on their external extractors and couldn't figure out that the problem was simply that they made them too short. So instead of correcting the problem, they ditched them. That legacy still lives on in their 22 Conversion slides... S&W and Sig both screwed up on their first go at external extractors too, but they corrected them.
__________________
Jim CBOB0497 "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working class flat or laborer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell
|
Hybrid Mode